3.1 As set out in section 1, financial viability has proven to be a consistent challenge for developments liable for Greening Blackpool SPD obligations. In officer experience, this has most particularly been the case for change of use proposals and major scale schemes proposing a significant amount of floorspace.
3.2 Change of use applications may represent a relatively minor form of development, but they can have a very significant positive impact on the character and appearance of an area. This is certainly true within the defined Inner Area of the town where the redevelopment of a long-vacant property in a state of disrepair can lift the quality of a street, and often improve the quality of life for immediate neighbours who may have had to deal with issues of anti-social behaviour or structural decay.
3.3 The council wishes to encourage and support the redevelopment and regeneration of existing properties, and so considers it appropriate to remove the requirement for Greening Blackpool SPD obligations from change of use schemes. To help compensate for any loss of tree planting that would result, the proposed SPD would place greater emphasis on the provision of on-site greening. For example, within the densely developed inner areas of the town, the planting of a shrub or hedgerow at the front of a property would likely have a far more beneficial visual and greening impact than a tree planted off-site outside of the immediate streetscene.
3.4 It is proposed that new-build holiday accommodation continue to be liable for tree planting. This reflects the fact that holiday makers to the town benefit from the greening of the environment and also leave an environmental footprint that can be mitigated in part through provision of green infrastructure.
3.5 Holiday accommodation is not liable for public open space provision because, whilst some visitors may use local parks whilst in Blackpool, it is unlikely to be a main feature of their stay. Instead, public open space within the borough is considered to be most used and of most benefit to permanent residents.
3.6 It is recognised that financial viability may continue to be a challenge in some cases. However, the provision of financial viability appraisals as part of larger application submissions is anticipated to be less of a disproportionate burden for developers.